Legal Opinion

McCaleb v. Reed

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 6, 1932No. 8 Div. 431PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, 3.

The rule is now firmly settled that plaintiff in a suit of this sort has the right to have the jurors qualified as to their connection with an insurance company which would be liable in whole or in part for any judgment that might be rendered against defendant. Gammill v. Culverhouse, 217 Ala. 65, 114 So. 800; Cooper v. Auman, 219 Ala. 336, 122 So. 351 (both cases cite the authorities). The record shows no error in this respect.

Defendant’s claim for the affirmative charge is based upon plaintiff’s testimony that he was proceeding up a grade in the highway on a straight stretch, at a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Watts v. Montgomery Traction Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Cooper v. AgeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Ivy v. MarxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. City of Birmingham v. MauzeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Salter v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Havard v. PALMER & BAKER ENGINEERS, INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  2. Francis v. Imperial Sanitary Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. HARVEY REGLAND COMPANY v. NewtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  4. Lawson v. General Telephone Company of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  5. Tyler v. DrennenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API