Legal Opinion

McKinnon v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 3, 1916PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. E. C. CROW. Action by R. A. McKinnon against the city of Birmingham and others, for damages alleged to have been sustained by a fall caused by a defective street. Judgment for defendant and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Appellant brought suit against appellee for recovery of damages-alleged to have been sustained by a fall on the sidewalk of the city of Birmingham, caused by stumbling over a stake across which a wire was stretched. The complaint, as last amended, shows that on August 7, 1914, plaintiff made out in writing his claim against the said city for the damages therein set forth and his claim was duly verified. It was set forth that the injury occurred on May 20, 1914, and the said claim was duly presented and filed with the clerk of said city. The demurrer to the complaint, as last amended, which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brannon v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Hase v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railroad v. CarlossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  4. Bland v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  5. Sullivan v. City of SyracuseNew York Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Grambs v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  2. City of Birmingham v. MauzeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Taylor v. BailesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Benton v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. City of Anniston v. RosserSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API