State v. Horn
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Malheur Circuit Court. Action by the state against Riley M. Horn and others. Judgment for the state, and defendants appeal. Motion to affirm the judgment for appellants’ failure to serve and file a brief.
1Per curiam
This is a motion to affirm a judgment. The transcript was filed at Pendleton on April 11, 1901, and on the tenth of May, in pursuance of the stipulation of the parties, the cause was transferred to Salem for argument. No brief has been filed by the appellants, however, and for this reason the attorney-general moves to affirm the judgment. No excuse is offered for the failure to file the brief, except that the rules of the court on that subject do not apply to cases for hearing at Pendleton. But Rule 32, which was framed by and adopted at the suggestion of a committee of the Eastern Oregon…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reynolds v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- Blank v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- State v. RoweOregon Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commercial National Bank v. TempleOregon Supreme Court · 1910
- Cole v. Willow River Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911