Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Jackson County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1898PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From Jackson : Hiero K. Hanna, Judge. Action by Daniel Reynolds against Jackson County, in which the former had judgment. Heard on motions to strike and to affirm.

1Per curiam

This appeal is prosecuted by the defendant. The plaintiff moves, upon notice to defendant, to *423strike from the transcript the reporter’s notes of the evidence and trial in the court below, and to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that the errors assigned in the notice of appeal do not appear by bill of exceptions. At the hearing, the respondent filed another motion, to affirm the judgment appealed from, upon the ground that appellant had failed to file and serve its brief in conformity with rule 6 (37 Pac. vi.) of this court. By stipulation of the parties, both motions were heard and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McQuaid v. Portland & Vancouver R. R. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Neppach v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  3. State v. MackOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Close v. CloseOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Swanson v. LeavensOregon Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Van De Wiele v. GarbadeOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Goodro v. TarkeySupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  3. Nosler v. Coos Bay Navigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Schade v. MullerOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Hand Manufacturing Co. v. MarksOregon Supreme Court · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API