Legal Opinion

Commercial National Bank v. Temple

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1910PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From Umatilla: Henry J.. Bean, Judge. This is an action by the Commercial National Bank of Pendleton against J. F. Temple, Jr., and W. P. Temple. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendants attempt to appeal. Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal and to affirm the judgment of the circuit court. Motion allowed and appeal dismissed.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from Umatilla County. The transcript was filed November 18, 1909. On April 21, 1910, plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss the appeal and to affirm the judgment, for the reason that defendants have failed to file a brief within the 30 days after the filing of the transcript, as required by Rule 37 of this court, 50 Or. 589 (91 Pac. xii). There is no appearance upon this motion by defendant, and as no brief was filed by him, as required, the motion is allowed, the appeal dismissed, and the judgment affirmed. State v. Horn, 39 Or. 152 (65 Pac. 1066); Schafer v. Beecher,…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shafer v. BeecherOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State v. HornOregon Supreme Court · 1901

4Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. EndsleyOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Carmichael v. CarmichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Abrahamson v. Northwestern Pulp & Paper Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Finch v. Pacific Reduction & Chemical Mfg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Taylor v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API