Legal Opinion

State v. Rowe

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Clatsop : Titos. A. McBride, Judge. A. M. Rowe appealed from a conviction on a criminal charge. The attorney-general moves to dismiss the appeal.

1Per curiam

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the appellant has failed to prepare, serve and file a printed brief within the time required by Rule 6 of this court: 35 Or. 593. The appeal having been perfected, the transcript was filed herein October 22, 1898, and the brief of appellant should have been served and filed within twenty days thereafter. But, although more than fifteen months have elapsed, no attempt has been made to comply with such requirement until after the motion to dismiss was interposed. By a cross motion, the appellant now seeks to be relieved from the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HornOregon Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API