Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. ART METAL, INC., ETC. & GEN. DYN.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 28, 1968PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

101 N.J. Super. 156 (1968)

243 A.2d 828

LAWRENCE H. ROSENTHAL, INDIVIDUALLY AND t/a INDUSTRIAL REALTY AND FEIST & FEIST, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

ART METAL, INC., ETC., AND GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, ETC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 29, 1968.

Decided May 28, 1968.

Before Judges GAULKIN, LEWIS and KOLOVSKY.

Mr. Philip L. Chapman argued the cause for Feist & Feist (Messrs. Hellring, Lindeman & Landau, attorneys).

Mr. Joel Sondak argued the cause for Lawrence H. Rosenthal (Messrs. Waldor & Hochberg, attorneys).

Mr.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Roman v. LobeNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Tanenbaum v. Sylvan Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  4. Bendell v. De DominicisNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Rooney v. Brogan Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. De Benedictis v. GerechoffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  2. Farragut Baggage & Transfer Co. v. Shadron Realty Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  3. Sherman v. LynchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  4. Tobias v. Comco/America, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. Rosenthal v. Art Metal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API