Legal Opinion
Tanenbaum v. Sylvan Builders, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 2, 1959PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Ekancis, J.
Plaintiffs are real estate brokers. J. J. Tanenbaum is licensed as such only in the State of New York; A. P. Levin, Inc., a New Jersey corporation, is licensed in this State. They brought suit charging that the defendants, by tortiously interfering with their prospective contractual advantage in connection with the sale of certain New Jersey realty, deprived them of commissions. The trial court entered summary judgment against Tanenbaum on the ground that ho was barred from recoveiy under N. J. S. A. 45:15-1 et seq., because he had no…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Scudder v. Union National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- The KensingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Bothwell v. Buckbee-Mears CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Cochran v. EllsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Bendell v. De DominicisNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Weston Funding Corporation v. Lafayette Towers, Inc. And George C. PeckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Accountemps Division of Robert Half of Philadelphia, Inc. v. Birch Tree Group, Ltd.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- 2175 Lemoine Ave. v. Finco, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Lucas v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Weston Funding Corp. v. Lafayette Towers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.