Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. Art Metal, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 17, 1969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

53 N.J. 344 (1969)

250 A.2d 747

LAWRENCE H. ROSENTHAL, INDIVIDUALLY AND t/a INDUSTRIAL REALTY AND FEIST & FEIST, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

ART METAL, INC., ETC., AND GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, ETC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 5, 1969.

Decided March 17, 1969.

Mr. Edwin H. Stern argued the cause for appellant, Feist & Feist (Messrs. Hellring, Lindeman & Landau, attorneys).

Mr. Joel Sondak argued the cause for appellant Lawrence H. Rosenthal (Messrs. Okin, Okin & Sondak, attorneys; Messrs. Schechner & Targan, of counsel).

Mr. William…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. ART METAL, INC., ETC. & GEN. DYN.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  2. Rosenthal v. Art Metal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  2. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API