Rosenthal v. Art Metal, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
53 N.J. 344 (1969)
250 A.2d 747
LAWRENCE H. ROSENTHAL, INDIVIDUALLY AND t/a INDUSTRIAL REALTY AND FEIST & FEIST, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
ART METAL, INC., ETC., AND GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, ETC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued March 5, 1969.
Decided March 17, 1969.
Mr. Edwin H. Stern argued the cause for appellant, Feist & Feist (Messrs. Hellring, Lindeman & Landau, attorneys).
Mr. Joel Sondak argued the cause for appellant Lawrence H. Rosenthal (Messrs. Okin, Okin & Sondak, attorneys; Messrs. Schechner & Targan, of counsel).
Mr. William…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rosenthal v. ART METAL, INC., ETC. & GEN. DYN.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Rosenthal v. Art Metal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
3Cited by2 opinions
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010