Legal Opinion
Sherman v. Lynch
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 29, 1970No. 70-116PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
By this appeal, the plaintiff seeks review of a judgment non obstante vere-dicto. Having made a motion for directed verdict at the close of all the evidence, the appellee’s motion should have been a “Motion For Judgment In Accordance With Motion For Directed Verdict”. See Rule 1.480(b), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 30 F.S.A., as referred to in De Mendoza v. *800Board of County Commissioners, Fla.App.1969,221 So.2d 797.
In this real estate brokerage action, the plaintiff-broker contended that his office had an oral cooperating agreement with a broker by the name of Shuey who was, in fact, the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Skene v. CarayanisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- McAllister Hotel v. PorteSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Dudley v. Harrison, McCready & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1937
- Griffin v. Societe Anonyme la FloridienneSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- Estes v. MoylanSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kikis v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- L. C. Morris, Inc. v. AllisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Deepak Raj v. Brett Sutherlin, as Personal Representative of the Estate of George A. SutherlinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
- Sherman v. LynchSupreme Court of Florida · 1971