State v. Harward
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtMooke, J.
Defendant assigns as error the denial of his motion in arrest of judgment.
The crime against nature is sexual intercourse contrary to the order of nature. It includes acts with animals and acts between humans -per anum and per os. State v. Fenner, 166 N.C. 247, 80 S.E. 970. “. . . our statute is broad enough to include in the crime against nature other forms of the offense than sodomy and buggery. It includes all kindred acts of a bestial character whereby degraded and perverted sexual desires are sought to be gratified.” State v. Griffin, 175 N.C. 767, 94 S.E. 678. “Proof of penetration of or…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. WhittemoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. . WoolardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- State v. . KellerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- State v. . SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- State v. LanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. ElamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. DossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. HagemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.