Legal Opinion
Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District v. Halman
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 27, 1968No. Civ. 8649PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTamura, J.
Defendant appeals from that portion of a judgment in condemnation denying prejudgment interest on the award.
Plaintiff (District) brought an action in eminent domain to acquire a flowage easement over portions of defendant’s land in connection with the construction of a flood control levee along a segment of the San Jacinto River, including its tributary, Bautista Creek, in Riverside County. The chronology of the pertinent events was as follows: Plaintiff filed its action on April 21, 1961; the levee was completed on May 23, 1962; trial commenced on March 14, 1966, and judgment in condemnation…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- United States v. Gerlach Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Aaron v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Holtz v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Andrews v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Lussier v. San Lorenzo Valley Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Orange County Flood Control District v. Sunny Crest Dairy, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.