Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Boyer
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 24, 1932No. Docket No. 811PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is a motion to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment on the grounds that the appeal is taken for delay and that the questions presented for the decision of this court are so unsubstantial as not to require further argument. The motion is made under section three of rule Y of the Buies for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal.
Bespondent was injured in an automobile accident in Fresno County and recovered a substantial judgment. Appellant has presented two grounds upon which he urges a reversal; first, that the damages awarded are so excessive that they were obviously the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brown v. GowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles-Inyo Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Foerst v. HobroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Dalton v. Los Angeles College of ChiropracticCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Thomas v. CaineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hall v. WolfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Henry H. Cross Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Aragon v. ParsonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Butcher v. ThornhillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.