Legal Opinion

Aragon v. Parsons

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1933No. Docket No. 1099PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal or affirm an order granting a motion for new trial, under the provisions of section 3, Rule V, Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal.

The action grew out of a collision of motor vehicles in an intersection of public streets in the city of San Diego in which Celia Elias de Aragon, wife of Jose Aragon, was injured. The jury returned verdicts for the defendants. The trial court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for new trial “upon the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdicts”.

We have examined appellants’ opening…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles-Inyo Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Thompson v. BoyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Yi Rong v. State of Arizona, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API