City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles-Inyo Farms Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is a motion to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment made under the provisions of section 3, Rule Y, Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal, which became effective on July 1, 1932. It is recited in the moving papers that the “Motion will be based upon, the clerk’s transcript on appeal, the reporter’s transcript on appeal, upon the appellants’ opening brief and respondents’ brief.” From this statement it would appear that respondents expect this court, in deciding the motion, to examine the same records that it would have to review were the case submitted on its…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Libby v. KippCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Dalton v. Los Angeles College of ChiropracticCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Thomas v. CaineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Sumner v. EdmundsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hall v. WolfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Thompson v. BoyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Henry H. Cross Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Inga v. BlumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.