Starszak v. Kochanik
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
The sole question presented on this appeal is whether or not the plaintiff made a bona fide con*475tinuous effort to procure a purchaser for the premises in question within the rule laid down in Huchting v. Rahn, 179 Wis. 50, 190 N. W. 847, and Genske v. Christensen, 189 Wis. 520, 208 N. W. 467. As was said in the Genske Case, ordinarily the question of whether or not under the facts there was a bona fide effort by the broker to make a sale is a question of fact, but there must be evidence which will sustain such a finding.
It is difficult to see how a broker could do anything and do less than was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Huchting v. RahnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Genske v. ChristensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dixon v. GustavWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- American Property Services, Inc. v. BarringerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- American Property Services, Inc. v. BarringerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977