Huchting v. Rahn
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.
Plaintiff’s first assignment of error is based upon the refusal of the court to grant his motion for a directed verdict. The contract in question is not the usual real-estate agency contract. Ordinarily an agent is not entitled.to a commission where his efforts have proven unsuccessful. His reward comes only with success. He may be ever so active and even expend a large sum of money in an effort to procure a purchaser, but. if he fails the loss is solely his and he loses the labor, and effort which was staked upon success. On the other hand, the slightest effort resulting in success entitles…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- W. G. Taylor Co. v. BannermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Graham v. LampWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by7 opinions
- Genske v. ChristensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Kuehnle v. SchromenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Peterson v. WingertsmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Starszak v. KochanikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Rodaks v. HerrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.