Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Gustav

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1957No. 34308PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This is an action by a realtor (based upon a portion of a written agreement, hereinafter set out) to recover a five per cent commission computed on the price received by respondents for the sale of certain land in King county.

The cause was tried to the court, sitting without a jury. At the close of all evidence the trial court dismissed the amended complaint with prejudice. This appeal follows.

Except as otherwise stated, respondent Mercia E. Gustav was not a participant in any of the events hereinafter described. Hence, Robert Gustav will be referred to as if he were the sole respondent.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. LaHue v. Coca Cola Bottling, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Silhavy v. DoaneWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Hering v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Starszak v. KochanikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Northwest Collectors, Inc. v. EndersWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Wise v. FardenWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. James S. Black & Co. v. P & R Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. Mid-Century Insurance v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  5. McMenamin v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API