Legal Opinion

Genske v. Christensen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

The appellant relies upon the authority of Huchting v. Rahn, 179 Wis. 50, 190 N. W. 847. In that case the owner of property gave a real-estate agent the exclusive authority to sell the same. It appeared in that case that shortly after the execution of the contract the real-estate agent caused to be prepared a “For sale” sign to be exhibited upon the premises, but which the defendant refused to have exhibited, and the sign was removed. It further appeared that the agent attempted to interest a person in the purchase of the property who was financially unable to purchase; that he submitted the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Huchting v. RahnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Isern v. GordonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  2. Starszak v. KochanikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  3. American Property Services, Inc. v. BarringerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  4. American Property Services, Inc. v. BarringerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API