Legal Opinion
Montgomery v. John Doe 26
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 21, 2000No. Nos. 00AP-304, 00AP-316 and 00AP-351PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Peggy Bryant, Judge.
Defendants-appellants, John Doe 32, 54, and 98, appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting the summary judgment motion of plaintiff-appellee, Ohio Attorney General, Betty D. Montgomery. John Doe 32 assigns the following error:
“The trial court abused its discretion when it found that the statute of limitations had not run in this case and granted appellee’s motion for summary judgment; thereby denying appellant’s right to due process and equal protection of law.”
John Doe 54 assigns the following errors:
“I. The trial court erred in finding…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- United States v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. McKinleyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. WillanOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Veterinary Dermatology v. Bruner, Unpublished Decision (10-21-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Crawford v. Am. Family Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Masters v. Ohio Dept. of MedicaidOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.