Haley v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of Clark
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Parraguirre, J.:
In this opinion, we address the scope of a district court’s authority to unilaterally modify a settlement agreement under NRS 41.200, Nevada’s statute governing the compromise of a minor’s claim.
Because NRS 41.200 leaves the allocation of fees and costs to the district court’s discretion, we conclude that the district court may adjust the terms of the settlement in accordance with the minor’s best interest. As such, we deny in part this writ petition. However, because the district court in this case provided no explanation for the allocation of fees between…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pan v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- International Game Technology, Inc. v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Round Hill General Improvement District v. NewmanNevada Supreme Court · 1981
- Robidoux v. RosengrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Brunzell v. Golden Gate National BankNevada Supreme Court · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Aspen Financial Services, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Haley v. DIST. CT.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Andrea Hollingsworth, et al. v. City of North Las Vegas, et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026
- H&H Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Chattem Chemicals, Inc., et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026
- LOGAN VS. ABENevada Supreme Court · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.