Legal Opinion

Pan v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of Clark

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 2004No. 42035PublishedCited by 684 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order that dismissed a complaint for forum non conveniens.

SUMMARY

In a series of prior decisions, this court has stated that mandamus is the proper method for challenging the dismissal of a case on forum non conveniens grounds. Those decisions, however, did not address the interplay between writ relief and the availability and adequacy of an appeal. But in other decisions, this court has recognized that an appeal is generally an adequate legal remedy that precludes writ relief.1 Consequently, we take this…

3Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Lee v. GNLV CORP.Nevada Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State ex rel. Boardwalk Shopping Center, Inc. v. Court of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Pengilly v. Rancho Santa Fe Homeowners Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Fogade v. ENB Revocable TrustCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  5. Ashokan v. State, Department of InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by684 opinions

  1. D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Cote v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Club Vista Financial Services, L.L.C. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  4. We The People Nevada ex rel. Angle v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Chambers v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

679 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API