Legal Opinion
H&H Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Chattem Chemicals, Inc., et al.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided July 30, 2026No. 2:16-cv-02148Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 2 3 H&H Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Case No. 2:16-cv-02148-CDS-EJY 4 Plaintiff Order Granting in Part the Defendants’ Motion for Attorney’s Fees 5 v. 6 Chattem Chemicals, Inc., et al., [ECF No. 195] 7 Defendants 8 9 On August 29, 2025, the court entered an order finding that H&H Pharmaceuticals, 10 LLC’s first amended complaint failed to sufficiently allege a Nevada Uniform Trade Secrets Act 11 claim and that its second amended complaint was futile. Order, ECF No. 192. Accordingly, the 12 case was dismissed with prejudice, and judgment was entered…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Brunzell v. Golden Gate National BankNevada Supreme Court · 1969
- Mro Communications, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company, Now At&t Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Van Duyn Ex Rel. Van Duyn v. Baker School District 5JCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.