Legal Opinion

Speicher v. Dalkon Shield Trust

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 6, 1996No. 2:96-cv-01129PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOYNER, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

In this diversity action, plaintiff Carole Ann Speieher is suing Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust 1 (“Daikon Shield”) for reproductive problems she claims were caused when she used an Intrauterine Device (“IUD”) in the 1970s. Plaintiff has asserted a claim for negligence, failure to warn, strict liability, breach of warranty and fraudulent concealment.

Defendants have filed a summary judgment motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c), alleging that plaintiff is barred from asserting a claim because Pennsylvania’s statute of limitations has…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  3. Cathcart v. Keene Industrial InsulationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Cochran v. GAF Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Ciccarelli v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Honey Creek Stone Co. v. Telsmith Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County2009
  3. Augustin v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. DRUMHELLER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. Johnson v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API