Legal Opinion

Augustin v. City of Philadelphia

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 1, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-CV-4238Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOYNER, DISTRICT JUDGE

This § 1983 action is once again before this Court on Motion of the Plaintiffs to certify this matter as a class action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23. Specifically, Plaintiffs move to certify a class of Philadelphia landlords whose properties have been or will be liened by the Philadelphia Gas Works for unpaid gas services incurred by delinquent tenants. For the reasons stated below, the motion shall be granted.

History of the Case

This action was commenced in July 2014 by two married couples, Lea and Gerard Augustin and Thomas and Donna MeSorley, who…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API