Legal Opinion
Roche Palo Alto LLC v. Apotex, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 11, 2007No. C05-02116 MJJPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MARTIN J. JENKINS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Before the Court is Plaintiffs Roche Palo Alto LLC and Allergan, LLC’s Motion For Summary Judgment. (Docket No. 52.)
For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the Motion, as described in more detail below.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This case involves the same parties, and the same patent, as a previous matter litigated to judgment before this Court: Syntex v. Apotex, Case No. 3:01-cv-02214 MJJ (“Syntex”). As with Syntex, this case is about Defendants’ proposal, in an Abbreviated New Drug Application…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Roche Palo Alto LLC v. Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- In Re Omeprazole Patent LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Astrazeneca UK Ltd v. Watson Laboratories, Inc. (NV)District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Finjan, Inc. v. Blue Coat Sys., LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Orexo AB v. Actavis Elizabeth LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.