Legal Opinion
Orexo AB v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 12, 2019No. Civil Action No. 17-205-CFCPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONNOLLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This patent suit was filed by Plaintiffs Orexo AB and Orexo US, Inc. (collectively, "Orexo") against Defendants Actavis Elizabeth LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. (collectively, "Defendants"). Presently before me is Orexo's motion for summary judgment that issue preclusion bars Defendants from relitigating the validity of U.S. Patent No. 8,454,996 (the "# 996 patent").1 D.I. 172. The matter is fully briefed. D.I. 173, 174, 203, 205, 210, 216, 218. For the reasons discussed below, I will…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bausch & Lomb Incorporated v. SBH Holdings LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2025
- Biogen International GmbH v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2020
- Orexo AB v. Actavis Elizabeth LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2019
- PureWick Corporation v. Sage Products, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2023
- Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Charter Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.