Legal Opinion
Roche Palo Alto LLC v. Apotex, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 9, 2008No. 2008-1021PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Circuit Judge.
This is a patent infringement case under the Hatch-Waxman Act. Apotex, Inc. and Apotex Corp. (collectively “Apotex”) appeal the grant of summary judgment by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California that the patent held by Roche Palo Alto LLC and Allergan, Inc. (collectively “Roche”) is valid and infringed by the formulation covered by Apotex’s abbreviated new drug application (“ANDA”). Roche Palo Alto, LLC v. Apotex, Inc., 526 F.Supp.2d 985 (N.D.Cal.2007). Because we find no error in the court’s holding that the reverse doctrine of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- DePuy Spine, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Jeanette Rea Jackson v. Bradley SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Marchon Eyewear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Skyline Steel, LLC v. PilePro, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Senju Pharmaceutical Co. v. Apotex Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.