Legal Opinion
District of Columbia v. Konek
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 27, 1984No. 83-889PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant, the District of Columbia, asserts that error attended the trial court’s order vacating a decision of the Metropolitan Police Department Police Trial Board (Trial Board) on the ground that only two of three Trial Board members participated in preparing the findings of fact and conclusions of law supporting the decision. We reverse and remand to the trial court.
Appellee, William Konek, was charged by the Police Department with violating two administrative regulations governing the conduct of police officers. Following a full administrative hearing, the Trial Board failed to issue…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Flotill Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kegley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- District of Columbia v. GrayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Kaiser v. REAL ESTATE COM'N OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
- Ralph D. Kaiser v. Albert F. Adams, and the Real Estate Commission of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Nathalia L. Brown v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services and Potomac Electrical Power CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Aziken v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011