Ralph D. Kaiser v. Albert F. Adams, and the Real Estate Commission of the District of Columbia
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
Petitioner, a licensed real estate broker, was charged by the Real Estate Commission of the District of Columbia with certain violations of the Code. He appeared before the Commission with his attorney who stipulated that “the charges and factual situation included in the charges are substantially correct.” The Commission suspended petitioner’s license for 90 days after which review was sought in the Municipal Court of Appeals which affirmed. 1 Our order permitting further review limited consideration to three specified questions, which may be paraphrased thus: whether the Commission might…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kaiser v. REAL ESTATE COM'N OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
3Cited by3 opinions
- Petition of KinscherffNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- Clackamas County, Oregon v. Douglas McKay Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- District of Columbia v. KonekDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984