Legal Opinion
Kaiser v. REAL ESTATE COM'N OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 19, 1959No. 2411PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROVER, Chief Judge.
Petitioner, a licensed real-estate broker, was charged by.the Commission with violations of Sections 1408(g) and (h), Title 45, Code 1951, in that: (1) he failed to properly account for or remit money coming into his possession belonging to others, Code 1408(g); and (2) had demonstrated such unworthiness or incompetency to act as such broker as to endanger the interests of the public, Code 1408(h). The pertinent provisions of the statute are set forth below. 1 After a hearing, petitioner’s license as a real-estate broker was suspended for 90 days.
In his petition for review…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brown v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Morris v. CashmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Clark v. City Council of WalthamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Lake De Smet Reservoir Company v. KaufmannWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
- Gaskin v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Flotill Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Petition of KinscherffNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- Pride v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Feldman v. Board of Pharmacy of Dist. of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
- District of Columbia v. KonekDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.