Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Stull Bros. v. Bartley

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1894No. 6953PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Original application for mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.

This is an original application for a writ of mandamus to require the respondent, as state treasurer, to register certain general fund warrants, and is submitted upon the following stipulation-:

“ It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties hereto, for the purpose of this case, and as the facts upon which the same is to be determined, that William Stull and Louis Stull are partners doing business under the firm name of Stull Bros., in the city of Lincoln, Nebraska; that the respondent is the duly elected, qualified, and acting treasurer of the state of Nebraska, and has been…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Bolton v. . AlbertsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Shoemaker v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. The People v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  4. Wenzler v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. State ex rel. Crounse v. BartleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Harte v. MoorheadNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  2. State ex rel. Johnson v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  3. State ex rel. Walker v. Board of Commissioners for Educational Lands & FundsNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  4. State ex rel. Quinn v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  5. State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API