State ex rel. Crounse v. Bartley
Nebraska Supreme Court
Original application for mandamus. cited: In re State Warrants, 25 Neb., 659; Storm v. Waddell, 2 Sandford Ch. [N. Y.], 544; Hall v. County Commissioners of Middlesex, 10 Allen [Mass], 102; Jennings v. Davis, 31 Conn., 139.
1Opinion of the CourtNokval, C. J.
This is an application for a mandamus by the state, on the relation of Lorenzo Crounse, against Joseph S. Bartley to compel respondent, as state treasurer, to pay relator, out of moneys belonging to the permanent school fund, the amount due him on a certain warrant issued by the auditor upon the state general fund. The material allegations of the petition are substantially as follows: On the 17th day of January, 1894, the relator was the owner and holder of a state warrant duly and legally drawn in his favor by the auditor of public accounts against the general funds of the state for the sum…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re State WarrantsNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fawn Lake Ranch Co. v. CumbowNebraska Supreme Court · 1918
- State ex rel. Johnson v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- State Ex Rel. Spire v. BeermannNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Belker v. Board of Educational Lands & FundsNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. KidderNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.