Legal Opinion

State v. Young

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1897No. 2709PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Original Application for Mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent, as state treasurer, to make the statutory indorsement of “ Not paid for want of funds ” upon a warrant drawn upon the general fund. The petition upon which the application for the writ is based recites that the relator is the owner and holder of the warrant; that on the 13th of September it was presented to the respondent and, “ there being no money in said general fund applicable to the payment thereof, relator demanded that said warrant be indorsed” that it was not paid…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Attorney General v. Utica InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  2. Shoemaker v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Scott v. DepeysterNew York Court of Chancery · 1832
  4. State ex rel. Stull Bros. v. BartleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tacoma Land Co. v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API