Legal Opinion

Steichen v. First Bank Grand

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 13, 1985No. C9-84-2063PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

Appellants William and Gloria Steichen seek review of the trial court’s order denying their motion for new trial and/or amended findings of fact, and from the judgment subsequently entered. The final judgment awarded appellants out-of-pocket losses for the wrongful repossession of their car by First Bank Grand; denied appellants punitive damages; dismissed the action in its entirety against Ron Saxon Ford, Inc.; and denied appellants’ claim for minimum statutory damages against either respondent under Minn.Stat. § 336.9-507 (1982).

Respondent First Bank Grand appeals the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Henderson v. Maryland National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Cobb v. Midwest Recovery Bureau Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Sieren v. American Family Financial Services of Wisconsin, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. New Concept Confinement Technology Feeders, Inc. v. KueckerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Davenport v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  2. Bloomquist v. First National Bank of Elk RiverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Nichols v. Metropolitan BankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Sammons v. Broward BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  5. Buzzell v. Citizens Automobile Finance, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API