Legal Opinion

Davenport v. Chrysler Credit Corp.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 1, 1991PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KOCH, Judge.

This appeal stems from the repossession of a new automobile shortly after its purchase. The buyers filed an action in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County seeking statutory and punitive damages. The trial court, sitting without a jury, found that the repossession was proper and awarded the creditor a $6,774 deficiency judgment on its counterclaim. The debtors have appealed, asserting that the automobile should not have been repossessed and that the repossession was carried out improperly. We find that the repossession was carried out improperly and, therefore, reverse…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. State v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  4. United States v. Article of Drug . . . Bacto-UnidiskSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. First City Bank-Farmers Branch, Tex. v. GuexTexas Supreme Court · 1984

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. SligerTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Pacific Eastern Corp. v. Gulf Life Holding Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  3. Velda J. Shore v. Maple Lane Farms, LLCTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  4. In Re Conservatorship of ClaytonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  5. Jacobs v. Healey Ford-Subaru, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API