Legal Opinion
Cracchiolo v. State
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 13, 1985No. 2 CA-CIV 5324PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIRDSALL, Presiding Judge.
In this decision we revisit Section 34, Twp. 21 South, Range 21 East, G & SRB & M, in Cochise County, Arizona. This very cause, Cochise County Superior Court No. 40463, was before us on an appeal from an order granting a temporary injunction. That decision is reported as Cracchiolo v. State, 135 Ariz. 243, 660 P.2d 494 (App.1983). We vacated the injunction, finding, in part, that the plaintiffs Cracchiolo had an adequate remedy at law for damages.
Our supreme court has also had occasion to decide a controversy concerning Section 34 and involving these same…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Southwest Engineering Co. v. ErnstArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
- State v. BirminghamArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Haggard v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. MoleraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. State Land DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Miller v. Gannett Outdoor Co. of Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Janusz v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Miller v. Gannett Outdoor Co. of Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.