State Ex Rel. Miller v. Gannett Outdoor Co. of Arizona, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VOSS, Presiding Judge.
The sole issue on appeal is whether a lessee’s expectation of continued lease renewals is a compensable property interest when the underlying land is taken by the state. For the reasons below, we affirm the trial court’s finding that it is not com-pensable.
Background
The facts are undisputed. Pursuant to a written agreement, appellant Gannett Outdoor Company of Arizona (Gannett) leased property from the Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District (SRP), on which Gannett maintained a sign structure. The original lease term was for three years ending…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Almota Farmers Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Willow River Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 76,745, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 49, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 143 in Re William v. Harrell. Robert P. Abele v. Phoenix Suns Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Whiteco Industries, Inc. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Cardi American Corp. v. All American House & Apartment Movers, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Abele v. Phoenix Suns Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.