Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Jones v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 20, 2014No. 1:11-cv-00681PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Class action — RCFC 23; Premium pay; Sunday premium pay under 5 U.S.C. §§ 5544(a) and 5546(a); Fathauer; Part-time employees; Numerosity; Commonality; Typicality; Adequacy; Superiority; Motion for class action under RCFC 23 allowed, in part.

OPINION

ALLEGRA, Judge:

Plaintiffs are current or former part-time employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs (the VA). Under RCFC 23, plaintiffs seek to certify a class of part-time government employees from any agency in the United States government, who were denied premium pay for regularly scheduled work on Sundays, allegedly in violation of 5…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Gross v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. BAUER v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  5. HARKINS v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API