Legal Opinion

Bacote v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 12, 2000No. 98-06-29,826M; CA A105109PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*46HASELTON, J.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying post-conviction relief and requiring him to pay $975 as the cost of his court-appointed counsel. ORS 151.505(1).1 We reject, without discussion, petitioner’s challenge to the denial of post-conviction relief and write only to address petitioner’s argument on appeal that the trial court erroneously imposed costs under ORS 151.505(1) because it “made no determination on the record regarding whether Appellant actually had adequate financial resources to pay the fees.” As explained below, we conclude that, because petitioner did not ask the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Davis v. O'BRIENOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. BucholzOregon Supreme Court · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bacote v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Antunez v. LampertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Hernandez-Reyes v. LampertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Butler v. LampertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Antunez v. LampertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API