Antunez v. Lampert

Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying post-conviction relief and requiring him to pay $975 as the cost of his court-appointed counsel. ORS 151.505(1).1 We reject, without discussion, petitioner’s challenge to the denial of post-conviction relief and write only to address petitioner’s argument on appeal that the trial court erroneously imposed costs under ORS 151.505(1) because it “made no determination on the record regarding whether Appellant actually had adequate financial resources to pay the fees.”

Here, unlike in Bacote v. Johnson, 169 Or App 44, 7 P3d 729 (2000), petitioner’s…