Legal Opinion
Hyman-Michaels Company v. Hampton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 12, 1970No. 44099PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Vice Chief Justice.
Petitioner has applied for extraordinary relief by writ of prohibition directed to re spondent. The issue involves respondent’s jurisdiction and authority to adjudicate petitioner’s relationship and status under petition seeking declaratory judgment authorized by 12 O.S.1961, § 1651 et seq. Matters summarized hereafter reflect the factual background which provoked the issue.
During abandonment of a railroad line in Osage County the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company issued invitations to bid upon taking up, removal and disposal of railroad track, bridges,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Ennis v. CaseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
- City of Cushing v. CoryellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mammoth Medical, Inc. v. BunnellKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
- Equity Insurance Co. v. GarrettCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
- DeGarza v. Oklahoma City UniversityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
- Independent School District No. 561002, Okmulgee County v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
- Mammoth Medical, Inc. v. BunnellKentucky Supreme Court · 2008