Legal Opinion

Mammoth Medical, Inc. v. Bunnell

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 2008No. 2008-SC-000048-MRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Justice SCOTT.

The Court of Appeals denied CR 76.36 relief to Mammoth Medical, Inc. (“Mammoth”), a medical supply distributor who petitioned for a writ of prohibition, seeking dismissal of a declaratory judgment action brought against it by the law firm Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC (“SKO”). The writ was filed after SKO took preemptive action by seeking a declaration of non-liability for Mammoth’s potential legal malpractice claim, asserting lack of causation as a defense. Mammoth appeals the denial of the writ as a matter of right pursuant to CR 76.36(7).

The principal issue…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Bender v. EatonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  3. Grange Mutual Insurance Co. v. TrudeKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Cunningham Brothers, Inc. v. Harry BailCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  5. Donadio v. CunninghamSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bowling v. Kentucky Department of CorrectionsKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  2. W.B. v. Commonwealth, Cabinet for Health & Family ServicesKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Bingham McCutchen, LLP v. McCourtMassachusetts Superior Court · 2011
  4. Bowling v. Kentucky Department of CorrectionsKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Brunswick TKTKonnect, LLC v. KavanaughDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API