Mammoth Medical, Inc. v. Bunnell
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Justice SCOTT.
The Court of Appeals denied CR 76.36 relief to Mammoth Medical, Inc. (“Mammoth”), a medical supply distributor who petitioned for a writ of prohibition, seeking dismissal of a declaratory judgment action brought against it by the law firm Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC (“SKO”). The writ was filed after SKO took preemptive action by seeking a declaration of non-liability for Mammoth’s potential legal malpractice claim, asserting lack of causation as a defense. Mammoth appeals the denial of the writ as a matter of right pursuant to CR 76.36(7).
The principal issue…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- Bender v. EatonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
- Grange Mutual Insurance Co. v. TrudeKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- Cunningham Brothers, Inc. v. Harry BailCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Donadio v. CunninghamSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bowling v. Kentucky Department of CorrectionsKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- W.B. v. Commonwealth, Cabinet for Health & Family ServicesKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
- Bingham McCutchen, LLP v. McCourtMassachusetts Superior Court · 2011
- Bowling v. Kentucky Department of CorrectionsKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- Brunswick TKTKonnect, LLC v. KavanaughDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.