Legal Opinion
Ennis v. Casey
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided December 1, 1951No. 7657, 7658PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEETON, Justice.
This action for declaratory relief under Sec. 10-1201, I.C. was instituted by Isabella Ennis, plaintiff and respondent, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, against "W. L. Casey doing business as Idaho Boyd-Conlee Company, appellant, hereinafter referred to as the company, and Boundary Grain and Feed, Inc., a corporation, appellant, hereinafter referred to as the corporation.
By an amended complaint plaintiff alleged that on and between August 19, 1946, and May 12, 1947, she stored with the company 747,715 lbs. of wheat and there were issued to her negotiable warehouse…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Heller v. ShapiroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Ladner v. SiegelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Oldham Co. Woolridge Co. Atty. v. Arvin, Co. R. En.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- R.G. Hamilton Corp., Ltd. v. CorumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Sweeney v. American National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. RollinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- General Ins. Co. of America v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co. v. HammondTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
- K.M.S. Research Laboratories, Inc. v. WillinghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Country Insurance v. Agricultural Development, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.