Robbins v. Nicholson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Did the injuries and resulting deaths of Terri and Robbins arise “out of their employment” within the meaning of the *424Workmen’s Compensation Act? The Industrial Commission answered in the affirmative and we think the Commission’s decision should be affirmed.
The two basic contentions of defendants are: (1) the Commission committed reversible error in refusing to admit testimony of a witness which, if allowed, would have indicated what Lewis’ state of mind was at the time of the shooting, this testimony being an exception to the hearsay rule; and (2) that the Commission erred in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harless v. FlynnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Taylor v. Twin City ClubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Morgan v. Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Petty v. Associated Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Wilson v. . MooresvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Blalock v. ROBERTS COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Epperson v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Dye v. Shippers Freight LinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Gallimore v. Marilyn's ShoesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Anderson v. Jordan Tree Svc.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.