Legal Opinion
Epperson v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 11, 1976No. 1 CA-IC 1347PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NELSON, Judge.
The primary question presented by this appeal is whether the assault upon Billie Epperson (Mrs. Epperson) on April 28, 1973 arose out of and occurred in the course of her employment with respondent Mountain Bell. The hearing officer found, and affirmed on review that while the assault occurred during the course of petitioner’s employment, it did not arise out of that employment, and was therefore not compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of Arizona. We agree with this conclusion and therefore affirm the award.
Mrs. Epperson sustained a gunshot wound while on the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Micucci v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Robbins v. NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Royall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- George R. Whitten, Jr., Inc., D/B/A Whitten Corporation v. State University Construction FundCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fair v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Gutierrez v. Artesia Public SchoolsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- Weiss v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Toto v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Temple v. Denali Princess LodgeAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.