Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Brown

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 11, 2012No. C 94-2307 CWPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ RENEWED MOTION TO REQUIRE DEFENDANTS TO TRACK AND ACCOMMODATE NEEDS OF ARMSTRONG CLASS MEMBERS HOUSED IN COUNTY JAILS, ENSURE ACCESS TO A GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE, AND TO ENFORCE 2001 PERMANENT INJUNCTION (Docket No. 1912)

CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs move for an order requiring Defendants to track and accommodate the needs of Armstrong class members housed in county jails and to provide access to a workable grievance procedure. Defendants oppose the motion. The matter was heard on October 27, 2011. Having considered oral arguments and all of the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Printz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brannan v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. (In re Brannan)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Alabama · 2013
  2. I.B. ex rel. Bohannon v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  3. (PC) Coleman v. NewsomDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. Mathis v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
  5. Oceana, Inc. v. RossDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API