Legal Opinion

Mathis v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 25, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2024-1312Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KENNEDY DAVIS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:24-cv-1312 (TNM) v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION A lifetime parolee with serious physical and mental impairments claims he faces disability discrimination at the hands of the federal agencies that supervise him. So he brings this case, on behalf of himself and other similarly situated parolees in the District of Columbia, against the U.S. Parole Commission and the Court Services and Offender Supervision…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API