Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of A.A.E.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 1, 1999No. C6-97-1727PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRINGER, J.

While deer hunting in St. Louis County appellant A.A.E. intentionally discharged a firearm several times in the direction of a noise he heard and movement he perceived, but tragically what he thought was a deer was in fact a deer stand occupied by 16-year-old Danelle Pogorels. Two shots struck Pogorels causing serious injury. Appellant was charged by petition with the intentional discharge of a firearm under circumstances that endanger the safety of another in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.66, subd. la(a)(2) (1998). Appellant essentially argued that the statute required…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Park Towers Ltd. Partnership v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. In Re the Welfare of A.A.E.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. LogeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Education Minnesota-Chisholm v. Independent School District No. 695Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. State v. ArkellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. State v. GundersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API