Legal Opinion

Minter-Wilson Drilling Co. v. Richins

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 15, 1982No. E-7451, CA 17866PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Plaintiff commenced this action to foreclose a construction lien for labor performed and material supplied in well-drilling activities pursuant to two contracts. Defendants Paul H. Richins, Richtron, Inc. and Richtron Financial Corporation (Richtron Financial) appeal from a judgment against them and Merrill Glenn, foreclosing plaintiffs lien against real property in which they were alleged to claim an interest, the fee title of which is apparently in Glenn, who has not appealed. The appealing defendants, hereafter referred to collectively as defendants, assign the following errors: (1)…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. KesslerOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Ward v. TOWN TAVERNOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Cottrell Et Ux. v. Prier Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. United Engine Parts, Inc. v. RiedOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. HollandOregon Supreme Court · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bennington v. Inland Investments Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API